Get the latest from the campaign.
November 7, 2012 Voters Reject Proposition 37
November 3, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Associated Press Story Stretching the truth? Misrepresenting the truth? Or was Yes on 37 just flat out lying?
November 2, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Stretching the truth? Misrepresenting the truth? Or was Yes on 37 just flat out lying?
October 25, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT Most respected U.S. scientific organization and publisher of Science magazine says mandated labels for GE foods “can only serve to mislead and falsely alarm consumers.”
October 24, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT U-T San Diego writes second No on 37 editorial, calls it a “scam” because of enforcement provisions allowing shakedown lawsuits.
October 22, 2012 Prop. 37 Will Trigger Flood of Lawsuits, Law Firms Warn Grocer, Food Company and Ag Clients
October 15, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: LA Times Columnist Michael Hiltzik says of Yes on 37: “Manifestly shoddy research is being used to promote Proposition 37”
October 11, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: La Opinión – CA’s Largest Spanish Language Daily Newspaper Urges No on 37
October 8, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT San Jose Mercury News and Santa Cruz Sentinel Urge No on Prop. 37
October 4, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Los Angeles Times, Santa Rosa Press Democrat, San Bernardino Sun, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and Victorville Daily Press Urge No on Prop. 37
October 1, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT Nine More Newspapers Oppose Prop. 37: Riverside Press-Enterprise, U-T San Diego, Orange County Register, LA Daily News, Long Beach Press-Telegram, Torrance Daily Breeze, Pasadena Star-News, Whittier Daily News, and San Gabriel Valley Tribune
September 27, 2012 Three More Newspapers Oppose Prop. 37: Merced Sun-Star, Modesto Bee and Redding Record Searchlight
September 24, 2012 Tight-Knit Group of Trial Lawyers Backing Proposition 37 Made Millions Suing Businesses Under Prior Ballot Measure They Helped Write
September 21, 2012 French Rat Study Author Made Reporters Sign Confidentiality Agreements Prohibiting them from Consulting Independent Scientific Experts
September 21, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT San Francisco Chronicle and Fresno Bee Recommend NO ON 37
September 19, 2012 No on 37 Response to Rat Study Released Today
September 18, 2012 No on 37 Launches Online Video Ads
September 17, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Sacramento Bee and Bakersfield Californian RECOMMEND NO ON 37
September 17, 2012 No on 37 Launches Statewide Radio Ads
September 14, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Ventura County Star Says No on Prop. 37 “Food labeling law leaves a bad taste”
September 13, 2012 New Yes on 37 Radio Ads Highlight Food EXEMPT From Prop 37’s Labeling Mandates
September 6, 2012 UC Davis Professors of Agricultural Economics Release New Report that Shows Proposition 37 Will Increase Costs for California Farmers and Food Processors by $1.2 Billion
September 4, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: San Jose Mercury News Calls Yes on 37 ad “Misleading”
August 29, 2012 NEW ECONOMIC STUDY: PROP. 37 WOULD INCREASE GROCERY BILLS FOR TYPICAL CALIFORNIA FAMILY BY HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
August 27, 2012 YES ON 37 INTERNET FUNDRAISING AD BASED ON FEAR, NOT FACT
August 16, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT Oakland Tribune, Contra Costa Times Editorials RECOMMEND NO ON 37
August 13, 2012 PALM SPRINGS DESERT SUN EDITORIAL: “We Don’t Need Prop. 37”
August 10, 2012 Court Rejects Yes on 37 Lawsuit. Agrees Proposition 37 Could Restrict Non-GE Processed Foods from Being Marketed as “Natural”
August 8, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT VICTORVILLE DAILY PRESS RECOMMENDS NO ON 37
August 7, 2012 State Attorney General and Legislative Analyst Agree: Prop. 37 Could Restrict ANY Processed Food from Being Marketed as “Natural” Even if it has NO Genetically Engineered Ingredients
August 1, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Prop. 37 Means “Bumper Crop of Litigation,” Say Defense Lawyers
July 12, 2012 Groups Reiterate Opposition to Deceptive and Costly Food Labeling Scheme
June 20, 2012 American Medical Association Takes Official Position that “there is no scientific justification for special labeling of bioengineered foods”
June 13, 2012 Scientific and Academic Community Responds to Qualification of Ballot Measure Mandating Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods
June 11, 2012 Farmers, Food Producers, Small Businesses, Grocers, Taxpayer Advocates and Community Groups Gear Up to Defeat Deceptive and Costly Food Labeling Proposition Now on the CA November 2012 Statewide Ballot
May 14, 2012 Food Labeling Proposition: “Right to Know” or Right to Sue??
May 14, 2012 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: NPR: “California’s Genetically Engineered Food Label May Confuse More Than Inform”
April 26, 2012 Family Farmers, Food Companies, Small Businesses, Grocers and Others Form Coalition to Oppose Deceptive and Flawed Food Labeling Proposition
April 2, 2012 Illinois “Doctor” Opposed to Mammograms and Vaccinations of Children Contributes another $300,000 to Deceptive Food Labeling Proposition
February 21, 2012 Nov. 2012 Ballot Measure To Label Genetically Modified Foods: “Unmodified, Unmitigated and Unadulterated Turkey”